Close Menu
ANTILLA MARTINIQUE | Avec vous depuis 1981

    Subscribe

    Get the latest creative news from ANTILLA on art, design, and business

    Current Trends

    Évolution institutionnelle : l’accord entre l’État et la Martinique publié au Journal officiel

    August 14, 2026

    BBS (LA MAUNY/TROIS-RIVIÈRES) : derrière la reprise par Les Bienheureux, un lourd défi industriel et financier

    August 14, 2026

    Souveraineté alimentaire : la Martinique manque-t-elle vraiment d’argent ?

    August 14, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    ANTILLA MARTINIQUE | Avec vous depuis 1981ANTILLA MARTINIQUE | Avec vous depuis 1981
    • Sections
      • Editorial by Henri PIED
      • Ecology / Environment
      • Art/Culture
      • Caribbean
      • Companies
      • Gdc's Perspective
      • Heritage
      • Politics
      • Health
      • Sports
      • Opinion Pieces
    • Our Files
      • Great Figures
        • Édouard Glissant
        • Aimé Césaire
        • Frantz Fanon
        • Pierre Aliker
        • Camille Darsières
        • Alfred Marie-Jeanne
        • Patrick Chamoiseau
        • Raphaël Confiant
        • Serge Letchimy
      • Key Issues
        • Sargassum
        • Rum
        • High Cost of Living
        • The Press in Martinique
      • Profile or Investigation
    • About
      • About Us
      • Media Kit
    • Contact
    • Change language to Français
    annonces
    SUBSCRIPTION
    ANTILLA MARTINIQUE | Avec vous depuis 1981
    Home » Toward Brain Prosthetics: When Artificial and Natural Neurons Communicate.
    Opinion Pieces

    Toward Brain Prosthetics: When Artificial and Natural Neurons Communicate.

    August 14, 2020No Comments
    Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp

    Fluorescence image of a cortical neuron culture. The cell membrane and axon are shown in green. The neuron's nucleus is shown in blue. Daisuke Ito, Author provided

    Toward Brain Implants: When Artificial and Natural Neurons Communicate

    July 23, 2020, 9:51 p.m. CEST

    Authors

    • Timothée Levi Associate Professor of Bioelectronics at LIMMS/CNRS-IIS, The University of Tokyo, and at the IMS, University of Bordeaux
    • Paolo Bonifazi Ikerbasque Research Associate, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Ikerbasque Foundation

    University of Bordeaux provides funding as a supporting member of The Conversation FR.

    View Partners from The Conversation 

    We believe in the free flow of information

    Reproduce our articles for free, in print or online, using our Creative Commons license

    A prosthesis is an artificial device used to replace an injured or missing body part. Many examples come to mind: some athletes use them in para sports. In science fiction, they are central to certain characters, such as Darth Vader. Now try to imagine a prosthesis that replaces part of a damaged brain.

    One of the challenges is getting the prosthesis to communicate with the biological body. For neuroprostheses designed to repair brain injuries, the goal is to get artificial neurons to «communicate» with real biological neurons. To this end, we have developed A new prototype in which artificial neurons transmit information to biological neurons and enable them to synchronize, all in real time. The stimuli from the artificial system are thus converted into neural activity in the biological system.

    A New Generation of Neuroprosthetics

    A neuroprosthesis is a device connected to the nervous system that can replace a defective organ. In recent years, there has been an emergence of’cochlear implant(a miniaturized implant to restore hearing), from artificial retina and brain-machine interfaces.

    These types of neuroprostheses are «simpler» than brain prostheses would be, because they operate in only one direction: from the sensor to the stimulator—like the retina or a cochlear implant—or from the brain to the actuator—like arm prostheses or the Controlling a robotic arm with the brain.

    One of the major challenges is designing a closed-loop system—from biology to artificial systems and vice versa—in which the system receives feedback based on the action taken, thereby enabling learning and resulting in a more reliable and accurate system. The second challenge lies in the complexity of the biological system, particularly the staggering number of neurons that need to be replaced: a few thousand in the retina, and several billion in the brain.

    What is an artificial neuron?

    There are actually two types of artificial neurons. In artificial intelligence, we often use formal neurons which can be modeled quickly and easily on a computer. This is a very different approach from «biomimetic neurons», which reproduce the the complexity of the electrical activity of a living neuron.

    This electrical activity, or more precisely «electrochemical», was elucidated in particular by Professors Hodgkin and Huxley, who were awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1963 for their modeling of the ionic mechanisms of a neuron. These mechanisms serve to modify the neuron’s cell membrane and create the potential for action, the electrical signal of a neuron.

    Establishing Communication Between Artificial and Biological Neurons

    Both types of artificial neurons—whether virtual or hardware-based—replicate the electrical activity of biological neurons, a prerequisite for «language» sine qua non to establish realistic communication between a population of biological neurons and a population of artificial neurons.

    The second necessary condition is to enable real-time communication. Indeed, biological neurons expect responses to their «question,» which consists of several action potentials—the «words» of neurons—lasting about one or two milliseconds. It is therefore necessary for the artificial system to be able to respond with a delay of less than one millisecond; this is the condition for it to be considered «real-time.”.

    This is what «biomimetic» artificial neurons look like: they are digital microchips. Author provided

     

    file-20200720-18366-1nnwvdm.jpgV

    But most artificial neural networks simulated on computers cannot keep pace with biological time. For example, a supercomputer can simulate one second of a mouse’s brain by several tens of minutes and consumes several megawatts. By comparison, the human brain consumes about 20 watts. To address this, these artificial neurons—developed using neuromorphic engineering—are implemented on a microchip that enables real-time, low-power operation (just a few watts) by performing calculations in parallel.

    The Ingredients for Real-Time Communication

    We have developed one of the The first real-time neuroprostheses incorporating artificial neurons, and then we decided to establish a more precise connection between the living and the artificial using a recent technique, the’optogenetics.

    Optogenetics combines optics and genetic engineering and uses light to stimulate neurons that have been genetically modified to be light-sensitive. As a result of this modification, they produce, or «express,» a a protein that reacts to light, opsin. Blue light activates neurons (increases the frequency of neuronal activity), while red light inhibits them (decreases the frequency of neuronal activity).

    What’s the benefit of this system? It enables much faster and more precise information transfer than the electrical stimulation used in previous neuroprosthesis prototypes: the electrodes used in electrical systems are about 10 micrometers on each side and cover, on average, just a few neurons. Optical stimulation occurs over an area of about one micron—similar to the size of a biological neuron—and can operate at high frequencies.

    To design this neuroprosthesis, we assembled a microchip containing artificial neurons, biological neurons that had been genetically modified to be photosensitive, and a light source.

    Translating the electrical language of neurons into light pulses

    The light source is programmable and enables the conversion of the electrical signals of artificial neurons into a light image.

    The electrical signals from the chip’s 64 artificial neurons are converted into an image representing the state of the 64 neurons. Remember, a neuron can be in a «stimulated» state or in an «inhibited» state—at rest. An artificial neuron in an «excited» state emits light within its square, unlike a neuron at rest. The image of the artificial neurons—composed of bright blue squares and dark squares—is projected onto an in vitro culture of photosensitive biological neurons that are stimulated by light, just as they would be by neurotransmitters in our bodies.

    body.

    [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBkN4kOXfj8?wmode=transparent&start=0]
    Biological neurons stimulated by light and controlled by a simulated artificial neural network.

    We record the physiological responses of biological neurons using electrodes.

    Synchronization of Neuronal Activity: A First Step Toward Real-Time Communication

    Biological neurons exhibit two types of activity: «spontaneous» activity, in which individual neurons fire from time to time, and a form of «synchronization,» in which a group of neurons fires in a chain reaction.

    Both of these types of activity can be replicated by artificial neurons. We use the «synchronization» type to establish communication between the artificial and biological systems. When synchronization activity is detected in the artificial system, a stimulus that mirrors this synchronization is sent to the biological network.

    As a result, we were able to achieve a high rate of information transfer between neurons by incorporating devices capable of operating in real time: artificial neurons and biological neurons were synchronized in their activity, as if «merged» into a single population.

    This work was conducted on in vitro neuron cultures. We are currently developing a new system that will allow us to conduct similar experiments in vivo to better understand how the brain works. However, for future implantable neuroprostheses in humans, the optogenetics technique would not be used, so as not to genetically modify the neurons.

    Combining optogenetic stimulation with artificial neural networks holds the promise of significant advances in neuroscience. Spatio-temporal resolution—the ability to target a single neuron or a small group of neurons in real time—is a major advantage for studying communication between artificial and biological neurons, and may lead to the development of functional therapeutic neuroprostheses for humans.

    Related Posts

    «What if the real change were a shift in Martinican political culture?» By Franck A

    August 11, 2026

    BACCHA FESTIVAL: A Resounding Success—When the Facts Speak for Themselves!

    August 10, 2026

    French West Indies: Is “Europeanization” the New Horizon?

    August 10, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Caribbean News
    Caribbean

    Saint Lucia Officially Launches a 1,000 EC$ Allowance for Newborns

    Source: St. Lucia Times By Quinn St. Juste Under this program, mothers of eligible, registered newborns will receive a stipend…

    OECO delegates review Sargassum management strategies following their mission to French territories

    August 2, 2026

    Pierre: Emancipation is incomplete without economic freedom.

    August 2, 2026

    Shark research conducted in the Cayman Islands is the subject of international debate.

    August 1, 2026

    Soufrière ranks second among the happiest tourist destinations in the world

    August 1, 2026
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHANNEL!
    Post Your Legal Notices

    Subscribe

    Get the latest news from Antilla Martinique.

    Thank you! Your request has been received.

    View legal notices
    View our back issues
    Our Different Sections
    Archives
    © 2026 Copyright ANTILLA. All rights reserved. Programmed by ANTILLA.
    • CONTACT
    • MARKETING
    • LEGAL NOTICE
    • LEGAL NOTICES
    • ABOUT ANTILLA

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.